Must Read - The Gandhian Confusion - Translation of गांधी गोंधळ . Now download without registration. Free PDF Download of Now 68 Books by Veer Savarkar.  
  शत्रूच्या शिबिरात, क्ष किरणे, Now download without registration.  
Türk Porno Kartal Escort bayan Maltepe escort Pendik Escort Kartal Escort Escort Bayan porno
  Shatajanma Shodhitana   शतजन्म शोधिताना
  Dance,Drama, Musical and Audiovisual Program based on literature of Veer Savarkar स्वा. सावरकरांच्या साहित्यावर आधारित दृकश्राव्य कार्यक्रम
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  Air Rifle Shooting-   नेमबाजी आंतरराष्ट्रीय दर्जाची एअर रायफल
  International standard Air Rifle shooting range. आंतरराष्ट्रीय दर्जाची एअर रायफल रेंज.
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  savarkar,veer savarkar, savarkar smarak, savarkarsmarak, activity, savarkar smarak activities, rifle shooting, boxing, gymnasium, yoga,savarkar literature, download savarkar book, books of savarkar, savarkar smarak activities Yoga   योग
  Yoga ; Natural way to healthy Life योग : निरोगी जीवनाची नैसर्गिक गुरुकिल्ली.
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  Boxing   बॉक्सिंग
  Gentleman's sport सभ्य गृहस्थांचा खेळ
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  savarkar,veer savarkar, savarkar smarak, savarkarsmarak, activity, savarkar smarak activities, rifle shooting, boxing, gymnasium, yoga,savarkar literature, download savarkar book, books of savarkar, savarkar smarak activities Karate   कराटे
  Unarmed combat Techniques. निशस्त्र युद्धकला
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  savarkar,veer savarkar, savarkar smarak, savarkarsmarak, activity, savarkar smarak activities, rifle shooting, boxing, gymnasium, yoga,savarkar literature, download savarkar book, books of savarkar, savarkar smarak activities Gymnasium   व्यायामशाळा
  A Well equipped Gym.. सुसज्ज बलोपासना केंद्र
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  savarkar,veer savarkar, savarkar smarak, savarkarsmarak, activity, savarkar smarak activities, rifle shooting, boxing, gymnasium, yoga,savarkar literature, download savarkar book, books of savarkar, savarkar smarak activities Archery    धनुर्विद्या
  Rapidly emerging as one of the best center in Mumbai. मुंबईतले झपाट्याने पुढे येणारे धनुर्विद्या प्रशिक्षण केंद्र.
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  UPSC, MPSC, CDS, IIT-JEE, NDA training   स्पर्धा परीक्षा वर्ग
  मार्गदर्शन केंद् : UPSC, MPSC, CDS, IIT-JEE, NDA
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  savarkar,veer savarkar, savarkar smarak, savarkarsmarak, activity, savarkar smarak activities, rifle shooting, boxing, gymnasium, yoga,savarkar literature, download savarkar book, books of savarkar, savarkar smarak activities Library   ग्रंथालय
  Best reference library on the Armed Freedom Struggle. सशस्त्र क्रांति या विषयावरील उत्तम संदर्भ ग्रंथालय
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  Mountaineering   गिर्यारोहण
  Spirit of Adventure ; love for Nature निसर्ग प्रेमींसाठी साहसी उपक्रम
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  savarkar,veer savarkar, savarkar smarak, savarkarsmarak, activity, savarkar smarak activities, rifle shooting, boxing, gymnasium, yoga,savarkar literature, download savarkar book, books of savarkar, savarkar smarak activities Rashtriya Geet Manch   राष्ट्रीय गीत मंच
  Learn Patriotic Songs देशभक्तीपर गीते शिका
   
मराठीत वाचा read
  savarkar,veer savarkar, savarkar smarak, savarkarsmarak, activity, savarkar smarak activities, rifle shooting, boxing, gymnasium, yoga,savarkar literature, download savarkar book, books of savarkar, savarkar smarak activities Savarkar Literature   सावरकर साहित्य मंच
  Collective reading of Savarkar Literature सावरकर साहित्याचे सामुहिक वाचन आणि चर्चा
   
मराठीत वाचा read
1
News :Rebuttal of Defamatory Article on Savarkar
Rebuttal of Defamatory Article on Savarkar
 
An article defaming Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar
 
has been published in the issue of ‘The Week’ dated 24th January 2016.
 
By distorting reality under the guise of research, the author has slighted a
 
great freedom fighter. The baseless allegations by A. G. Noorani and
 
Shamsul Aslam have been repeated, despite their having been
 
categorically contradicted repeatedly in the past.
 
Swantantryaveer Savarkar had rebelled against the British by
 
demanding complete independence in 1905 itself. In the contemporary
 
political milieu, not even the Congress had dared to voice such a demand
 
till 1930. The article defaming this uniquely courageous personality
 
contains mainly five allegations against Swantantryaveer Savarkar. They
 
are as follows:
 
Allegation no. 1 – While at Andaman, Swatantryaveer Savarkar
 
lost courage and wrote a series of apology letters to the British, and
 
he was never subjected to hardwork like Kolu (hand oil mill)
 
Reality – Swatantryaveer Savarkar had written numerous
 
applications for his release from prison; he even mentioned this fact in his
 
autobiography Maajhi Janmathep. However, these applications do not, in
 
any manner, express contrition or apology. Savarkar was a Barrister. As
 
such, his attempts to use legal means to free himself from imprisonment
 
cannot be criticized. He believed that it is the primary duty of every
 
revolutionary to free himself from the clutches of the British in order to
 
return to the freedom struggle. He often expressed this opinion before the
 
fellow revolutionaries imprisoned at Andaman. The great revolutionary
 
Sachchindranath Sanyal is living proof of this strategy. He had received a
 
life sentence for his complicity in the Lahore conspiracy and he secured
 
his release through a declaration like that of Savarkar. Then he returned
 
to his revolutionary activities and again received a life sentence as the
 
mastermind behind the famous Kakori conspiracy. On page 226 of his
 
autobiography “Bandi Jeevan” he says, ‘Savarkar had given the same
 
assurance of co-operation in his application that for release, as I had
 
given. Why was I released and his release denied...because the
 
Government was apprehensive that if Savarkar was released, the
 
revolution would flare up again in Maharashtra.”
 
‘The Week’ has cited an application dated November 1913.
 
However, it contains no hint of regret or apology. The main demand in this
 
application was “Either he be sent to Indian Jail where he is entitled to
 
certain previlages, or be given the status of Political Prisoners or alleast
 
he be given the privilages granted to common criminals”.
 
Whether spirit of Savarkar was really broken during imprisonment
 
or his applications were part of a larger strategy can only be ascertained
 
by referring to the records made by his fellow revolutionaries in prison as
 
well as the prison records. However, Mr. Takle has not used any of these
 
methods. The reality becomes apparent when we refer to the mentions of
 
Savarkar in the autobiographies of the well-known revolutionaries
 
Ullaskar Dutt, Bhai Paramanand, Prithvising Azad and Ramcharan
 
Sharma. Ullaskar Dutt had suffered through a phase of insanity due to
 
extreme torture. Before that, while he had been suspended from
 
handcuffs, he hallucinated in a high fever. He saw that Jailor Barry
 
challenged him to a duel and Savarkar fought the duel on his behalf and
 
defeated Barry. (12 years in prison life – page 64 & 65) The fact that even
 
in his hallucinations he thought only of Savarkar capable of fighting on his
 
behalf testifies to the high morale of Savarkar in 1912.
 
In 1913, when Ramcharan Sharma, the editor of Surajya Patra was
 
threatened with an increased sentence for participating in a strike, he
 
remarked “If Vinayak Savarkar can survive 50 years of imprisonment, I
 
shall survive too.” (Kala Pani ka Aitihasik Dastavej page 53) Thus, even
 
in 1913, Savarkar was a role model for the revolutionaries. If Savarkar had
 
lost his courage, this would not have been possible.
 
Great revolutionary Bhai Parmanand, who was also lodged in
 
Andaman, while writing about strike in 1919 said “For any conflich arising
 
in prison, Jailor Barry and Superintendent used to hold Savarkar brothers
 
responsible.” (“Aap Biti” page 102)
 
While submitting this application, he had discussed in person with
 
Sir Reginald Craddock. While forwarding this application to the British
 
Government, Sir Reginald Craddock had made certain
 
commens/observations in his covering letter dated November 23, 1913,
 
which are highly relevant in the present case. He says
 
“Savarkar’s petition is one for mercy. He cannot be said to express
 
any regret or repentance, but he affects to have changed his views, urging
 
that the hopeless condition of Indians in 1906-07 was his excuse for
 
entering upon a conspiracy. Since that time, he said, the Government had
 
shown itself much more conciliary in the matter of councils, education and
 
so forth, that the case for revolutionary action has disappeared.”
 
“In case of Savarkar, it is quite impossible to give him any liberty
 
here, and I think he would escape from any Indian Jail. So important a
 
leader is he that the Europeon section of Indian anarchists would plot for
 
his escape which would before long be organized. If he were allowed
 
outside the Cellular Jail in Andamans, his escape would be certain. His
 
friends could easily charter a steamer to lie off one of the islands and a
 
little money distributed locally would do the rest.”
 
“Even a man like Savarkar cannot be kept indefinitely at hard
 
labour. His consecutive sentences which will keep him in confinement for
 
life, are estimated at fifty years. In his case the punitive requirements
 
would have been satisfied after a few years’ hard labour, and the
 
remainder of his term would not be of the nature of a punishment for his
 
crimes but of mere incarceration, because he would be dangerous to the
 
community outside”
 
But these conclusisive observations of Sir Reginiold Creddock
 
made in his covering letter dated November 23, 1913 or actual
 
experiences of great freedom fighters like Prithvisingh Azad, Bhai
 
Paramanand, Ram Charan Sharma and Sachchindranath Sanyal have
 
been convinienty ignored by Mr. Niranjan Takale clearly proves that the
 
allegations made against Savarkar are false and made intentionally to
 
defame him.
 
On the basis of entries on Savarkar’s history sheet, Mr. Takle claims
 
that he was given the easier task of weaving rope rather than the arduous
 
tasks of Kolu (Hand oil mill) or coir pounding, and thereby imply that
 
Savarkar is not truthful in his biography Mazi Janmthep.
 
But Kolu (Hand oil mill) or coir pounding. were routine tasks for
 
prisoners and the history sheet would only include the entries of
 
punishments meted out and other personal information of the prisoners
 
and thus the entries of Kolu (Hand oil mill) or coir pounding were not found
 
in Savarkar’s history sheet or that of any prisoner.
 
In his memoirs “Kranti ke Pathik, great revolutionary Prithvi Sing
 
Azad says “ Veer Savarkar
 
It interesting to note that in the same application dated 14th
 
November 1913, which has been reffered by the Week, Savarkar had
 
complained about Kolu work allotted to him. In his covering letter to this
 
application, Sir Reginald Craddock also acknowledge this fact.
 
But these recorded facts and the testimonies of Savarkar’s fellow
 
prisoners like Prithvisingh Azad have been deliberately ignored by Mr.
 
Niranjan Takle in order to defame the great revolutionary leader
 
Swatantryveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar.
 
As per the prison records currently available, Savarkar was
 
subjected to the following inhuman punishments:
 
 30th August 1911 6 months solitary confinement until
 
further orders.
 
 11th June 1912 One month's separate confinement
 
for writing letters to others without sanction.
 
 10th September 1912. Seven days standing
 
handcuffs for having in possession a letter written to another
 
convict.
 
 23rd November 1912 One month's separate
 
confinement for being in possession of a note written by another
 
convict.
 
 30th December 1912 Refused to eat his food all day.
 
 1st January 1913 Do.
 
 2nd January 1913 Ate his food this morning.
 
 16th December 1913 Absolutely refusing to work.
 
 17th December 1913 One month's separate
 
confinement without work or books.
 
 8th June 1914 Absolutely refusing to work. Seven
 
days standing handcuffs imposed.
 
 16th June 1914 Absolutely refusing to work. Four
 
months chain gaug imposed.
 
 18th June 1914 Absolutely refusing to work. Ten days
 
cross bar fetters imposed.
 
 16th July 1914 Convalescent gaug for 1 month.
 
 18th May 1915 Convalescent gaug (Discharged on
 
11th June1916 on admission to hospital).
 
Since many punishments meted out to Swatantryaveer Savarkar
 
were illegal, no mention was made of them in the prison records. Not only
 
has Savarkar stated this in his autobiography Majhi Janmathep, it has
 
been corroborated by the references in the autobiographies of his fellow
 
prisoner revolutionaries. Even the incomplete list above is enough to
 
afford a glimpse of the extreme and inhuman punishments meted out to
 
Savarkar. On reaching Andaman, he was immediately put in solitary
 
confinement for six months. The magnitude and inhumanity of this
 
punishment can only be imagined.Savarkar had mention in his application
 
dated 14th November 1913 that only he was subjected to this treatment.
 
With reference to the prison records, Mr. Takle remarks that
 
Swantryaveer Savarkar’s conduct during the five years was very good.
 
However he has conveniently overlooked the following remark entered in
 
the column ‘Present Attitude’ – “He is always sauve and polite but like
 
his brother, he has never shown any disposition to actively assist
 
government. It is impossible to say what his real political views are at the
 
present time.”
 
This is a clear indication of the fact that in 1919, Savarkar was still
 
being regarded as a dangerous prisoner by the British Government. And
 
the decision to deny a general pardon to Savarkar was taken by the
 
Bombay Presidency Government based on this very report.
 
The fact that one after the meeting with Reginald Craddock (in which
 
he had presented the reffered application) Savarkar went on strike and
 
was sentenced to solitary confinement for one month as a result of it, that
 
he repeatedly refused to work despite suffering other inhuman
 
punishments is undoubted proof of his indomitable courage.
 
If further proof is required, Swatantryaveer Savarkar Rashtriya
 
Smarak has discovered genuine proof of Savarkar’s mental courage.
 
Three patriotic Urdu poems in Savarkar’s own handwriting have been
 
discovered in Andaman. These poems dated 1921 exhort the youth to
 
rebel against the British. One of these songs is believed to have reached
 
the accused in the Kakori conspiracy through Sachchindranath Sanyal.
 
Savarkar’s ghazal ‘Yahi Paoge’ was among the patriotic songs sung by
 
the imprisoned revolutionaries. (Kakori ke Diljale page 112). In one of his
 
Urdu poems Savarkar says
 
Our brave leader is the slayer of Ravan, Ram
 
Our proud charioteer is the God of Karmayog, Krishna himself
 
O Bharat, what army can stop thy chariot?
 
Why this delay, awake brothers, we are our own saviours.
 
The poem “Pahila Hapta” (First Installment) written before the
 
imprisonment at Andaman expresses the same sentiments found in this
 
poem. The newly discovered poems prove beyond doubt that rigorous
 
imprisonment for 11 years had not altered Savarkar’s beliefs in the
 
smallest degree.
 
Savarkar’s Thoughts about the petitions
 
Savarkar’s point of view behind the various petitions is elaborated
 
in his letter dated 6-7-1920, written to his brother. As this letter had been
 
censosred by prison administration, Government was aware of it. News
 
paper reports about this letter were published and Bombay police also
 
took note of it in their reports. The whole letter is reproduced below.
 
Cellular Jail
 
6-7-1920
 
Port Blair
 
My dearest Bal,
 
Your letter to dear Baba dated 2-6-20 reached us and made us glad
 
by removing the sense of anxiety caused by your constant postponing your
 
coming over here. My health is just as it was when you left me. It is not
 
worse either. But after your going the health of our brother has been going
 
from bad to worse. It is his turn now. The complaint is the same. Digestion
 
troubles and consequent liver disorder. His weight is 106 lbs. Because I
 
write this much do not imagine that our health must be worse still. Not so.
 
I write exactly as it stands. If something worse happens I shall inform you
 
of it.
 
After all the general amnesty has come ! Hundreds are being
 
released. Thanks chiefly to the great exertions of the Bombay National
 
Union and of our leaders and of our patriotic countrymen who organized,
 
supported and signed the mass petition for the release of Indian political
 
prisoners. That huge petition signed by no less than 75,000 people at such
 
a short notice as that must have certainly put an immense though
 
unacknowledged pressure on the Government. At any rate it elevated the
 
moral status of the P.P.s and therefore of the cause for which they fought
 
and fell. Now indeed our release if at all it comes in worth having, as the
 
people have expressed their desire to have us back. We cannot sufficiently
 
thank our countrymen for sympathy and solicitude for us all. They had
 
really shown greater regard for us than we honestly believe to have
 
deserved. Nor have their efforts been entirely fruitless. For although we
 
two have been declared to fall outside the scope of the Amnesty and are
 
still rotting in the cells yet the sight of hundreds of our political comrades
 
and co-sufferers' release makes us feel relieved and repaid for all the
 
agitation that we have been carrying on for the last eight years or so through
 
strikes, letters, petitions, the press, and the platform, here and else where.
 
On the 2-4-20 I put in a fresh petition to the Government of India on
 
subject of Royal clemency recently granted. Therein after thanking the
 
Government for the release of hundreds of political prisoners and for thus
 
partially granting my petition of 1918, I have pleaded for the further
 
extention of the Royal clemency to those who are yet in jail as well as to
 
the Political exiles abroad. I had once more defined my personal position
 
as regards the political situation in India, especially with reference to those
 
questions which from time to time are still being discussed and debated
 
upon in the official circles and have been personally pressed before me by
 
some of them only very very recently .
 
We believe in an universal state embracing all mankind and wherein
 
all men and women would be citizens working for and enjoying equally
 
the fruits of this earth and this sun, this land and this light, which constitute
 
the real Motherland and the Fatherland of man. All other divisions and
 
distinctions are artificial though indispensable. Believing thus that the ideal
 
of all political science and art is or ought to be Human state in which all
 
nations merge -their political selves for their own fulfilment even as the
 
cells in an organism, organisms in families and tribes, and tribes in nation-
states have done; and believing therefore that humanity is higher patriotism
 
and therefore any Empire or Commonwealth that succeeds in welding
 
numbers of conflicting races and nations in one harmonious, if not
 
homogenious, whole in such wise as to render each of them better fitted to
 
realize, enrich and enjoy life in all its noble aspects is a distinct step to the
 
realization of that ideal I can conscientiously co-operate with any attempt
 
to found a common-wealth which would be neither British nor Indian but
 
which may, till a better name be devised, be styled as an Aryan Common-
wealth. With this end in view I am willing to work now. And therefore I
 
rejoiced to hear that the Government have changed their angle of vision
 
and meant to make it possible for India to advance constitutionally on the
 
path to Freedom and strength and fullness of life. I am sure that many a
 
revolutionist would like me cry halt under such circumstances and try to
 
meet England under an honourable truce, even in a halfway house as the
 
reformed Council Halls promised to be, and work there before a further
 
march on to progress be sounded.
 
For it was this very principle that humanity was a higher patriotism
 
that made us so restless when we saw that a part of it should aggrandize
 
and swell like a virulent cancer in such wise as to threaten the life of the
 
human whole; and forced us for the want of any other effective remedy; to
 
take to the Surgeon's Knife and feel that severity for the moment would
 
certainly be mercy in the long run. But even while combating force with
 
force we heartily abhorred and do yet abhor all violence. For violence is
 
force aggressively used-force that is life killing. I never cherished not even
 
in my dreams any aggressive ambition for personal or national
 
aggrandizement, and so far was I from being a party to violence that I
 
actually kept opposing it tooth and nail whenever I saw it used by powerful
 
combinations against their weaker but righteous rivals. I heartily abhorred
 
violence resorted to in days gone by-by ambitious men and nations not only
 
outside India but even in India herself. I felt as rebellious against the caste
 
systems and the untouchability inside India as her dominated by foreigners
 
from outside.
 
Thus we were revolutionists under necessity and not by choice. We
 
felt that the best interests of India as well as of England demanded that her
 
ideals be progressively and peacefully realized by mutual help and co-
operation. And if that be possible even now I shall take the first opportunity
 
to resort to peaceful means and rush in the first constitutional breach
 
effected by revolution or otherwise, however narrow it be and try to widen
 
it so as to enable the forces of evolution to flow in an uninterrupted
 
procession.
 
If the reforms whole heartedly effected and worked out by the
 
Government would serve the purpose of such a constitutional breach as
 
that then revolution ceases and evolution becomes a watchword and a
 
rallying cry of us all. And I as one humble soldier in Her rank would
 
honestly try my best to make the reform successful, that is, work them out
 
so as to render them a stepping stone to the realization of the great mission
 
of our generation of making India free and great and glorious, leading or
 
marching hand in hand with others to the appointed destiny of man.
 
Such were my view when I was working in the revolutionary camp.
 
And such are my views after 12 long years of being pent up within the four
 
walls of a solitary cell. True it is that we found it impossible to bear love
 
and loyalty to laws that were dictated by the Sword, and constitutions that
 
serve as masks to conceal the heidousness of Tyranny yet it is equally true
 
that we honestly felt and still feel ourselves in duty bound to stand by the
 
side of Law -that is the expression of the righteous resolve of a free people
 
and constitution that holds together harmonizes and fuses the efforts of free
 
men and women towards the good of man and the glory of God.
 
As to the question so often put to me and others by officers no less
 
exalted than the members of the Indian Cabinet 'what if you had rebelled
 
against the ancient kings of India? They used to trample rebels under the
 
feet of Elephants'. I answer that not only in India but even in England and
 
all other parts of the world such would have at times been the fate of rebels.
 
But then why did the British people fill the whole world with a howl that
 
the Germans had ill treated their captives and did not allow them fresh
 
bread and butter ! There was a time when captives were flayed alive and
 
offered as victims to Moloch and Thor and such other Gods of war !' The
 
thing is this that this advanced stage in civilization attained by man is the
 
resultant of the efforts of all men and therefore their common inheritance
 
and benefits all. Speaking relatively to Barbarian times it is true that I had
 
a fair trial and a just sentence and the Government is at liberty to derive
 
whatever satisfaction they can from the compliment that they give a fairer
 
trial and a juster sentence to their captives than the cannibals used to do.
 
But it should not be forgotten that if in olden days the rulers flayed their
 
rebels alive then the rebels too when they got the upper hand flayed alive
 
the rulers as well. And if the British people treated me or other rebels more
 
justly i.e. less barbarously then they may rest assured that they too would
 
be as leniently treated by the Indian rebels if ever the tables are turned?
 
Please do not hope much from this petition so far as our release is
 
concerned. We never pitched our hopes too high and if not released we
 
shall not be very much disappointed. We are quite prepared to face it either
 
way. You have tried your best and it is mainly due to your unceasing efforts
 
that the release of P.P.s because such a burning question as that and though
 
not we two, yet hundreds of others have won back their liberty.
 
Hoping to find you in good health and with best and loving regards
 
to all our friends and relations.
 
I remain dear brother
 
Yours affectionately
 
TATYA
 
According to police report, this letter was reported in Maratha,
 
alongwith other newspapers, on 25th January 1920 and based on this,
 
question was asked in legislave assembly.
 
Allegation no. 2 – After his release, Swatantryaveer Savarkar
 
did not serve the nation, he collaborated with the British, he opposed
 
Netaji Bose.
 
During his prolonged house arrest of 14 years at Ratnagiri, Savarkar
 
was banned from political activity. So he directed his struggle against the
 
social evils of the caste system and superstitions prevalent in orthodox
 
Hindu society. In recognition and approbation of his signal contribution to
 
society in this 14 years, Karmaveer Bhaurao Shinde had remarked in his
 
speech ‘ May God grant the remaining years of my lifespan to Savarkar.
 
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar had remarked to Savarkar ‘ I am happy that
 
you are among the few people who believe in the eradication not just of
 
untouchability but of the caste system itself.”
 
As the detailed history of Savarkar’s immense struggle for
 
eradication of untouchability is available to all, a detailed discussion of it
 
is not merited.’ Let it suffice to state that had Savarkar been a collaborator
 
of the British, as alleged by Mr. Takle, numerous freedom fighters
 
including Mahatma Gandhi would not have travelled all the way to
 
Ratnagiri to meet Savarkar.
 
When Prithvisingh Azad later escaped from imprisonment and
 
returned to India, Swantantryaveer Savarkar’s younger brother
 
Narayanrao offered him refuge. (Kranti te Pathik – page 153). Later,
 
Prithvisingh Azad and well-known lady revolutionary Durgabhabhi Vora
 
opened fire on Lamington Police Station in 1930 to protest against Bhagat
 
Singh being sentenced to death. In this, they were accompanied by
 
Savarkar’s trusted colleague, freedom fighter Ganesh Raghunath
 
Vaishampayan. (Kranti ke pathik page 190)
 
As Savarkar was under constant police observation, it was
 
impossible for to organize revolutionary activities openly. A layman can
 
also observe this, but not Mr. Takle. Fact that after admitting himself that
 
revolutionary Vinayak Chavan was follower Savarkar, Takale makes the
 
allegation that Savarkar had joined hands with Britishers proves his
 
intention to defame this great revolutionary leader, Vinayak Damodar
 
Savarkar.
 
After 1937, when the political restrictions on Savarkar were relaxed,
 
he became President of the Hindu Maha Sabha. The threat of Partition
 
was looming over India against the backdrop of the unrealistic demands
 
of the Muslim league and the attempts of Congress to court the League.
 
At that time Swatantryaveer Savarkar took untiring efforts to make people
 
aware of the necessity of preventing Partition. Savarkar’s presidential
 
speeches are available for reference in the volume Hindu Rashtra
 
Darshan.
 
He aggressively campaingned for recruitment of Hindu youths in
 
Army. During that period, only 35-40% Indian soldiers were Hindues. But
 
because of campaign of Savarkar, this percentage increased to 65%.
 
Savarkar foresaw that in case of partition, Muslim regiments will go to
 
Pakistan and in case of war, greater military power of Pakistan will prove
 
hazardous to India. Savarkar really was a great visionary because this is
 
what happened. All the Muslim regiments joined Pakistan and Pakistan
 
started war in Kashmir. But due to foresight of Savarkar, Indian Army was
 
able to repell them.
 
Another aspect behind the policy of Militarisation.
 
Veer Savarkar was in contact with great indian revolutionary leader
 
residing in japan, Ras Beharo Bose, through some Japanese monks. In
 
view of the impending world war, they had plans for rebellion in armed
 
forces. Such attempts were also made during WW1, in which members of
 
Savarkar’s Abhinav Bharat had played an important role.
 
On 21st March 1942, Rasbihari Bose addressed Savarkar thus ‘ I
 
consider it my duty to bow before a senior fellow warrior like you. You
 
have once again proved your greatness by advocating the strategy that
 
Indian politics should never be dependent on the politics of a foreign
 
nation and that the enemy of our enemy should be our friend.”
 
On 25th June 1944, Netaji Subhashchandra Bose said in his address
 
on Azad Hind Radio “
 
With their eccentric and fanciful political thought and lack of
 
foresight, a majority of Congress leaders today are deriding Indian Army
 
soldiers as mercenaries; it is cause for satisfaction that Veer Savarkar is
 
exhorting the Indian youth to join the army. From this very army shall our
 
Indian National Army get trained soldiers.”
 
In addition to this, there is undoubted evidence that Savarkar was in
 
touch with the revolutionary Rasbihari Bose, the founder of the Azad Hind
 
Sena, who was then in Japan. According to it, it is clear that Rasbihari
 
Bose supported Savarkar’s initiative encouraging youth to join the army.
 
In March and April 1939, Rasbihari Bose penned a biography of Savarkar
 
for the Japanese magazine Dai Ajiya Shugi. This biography was titled
 
‘Savarkar – the rising leader of New India: his achievements and
 
personality’. It is important to note the conclusion of this article which
 
informs the people of Japan about Savarkar’s Hindutva and his policy of
 
encouraging the youth to join the army. He concludes his article thus ‘If
 
you agree with Savarkar, you will have political power, and he has a strong
 
position in the Indian independence movement.”
 
Allegation no. 3 – Savarkar propogated the two-nation theory.
 
As evidence for this, Mr. Takle cites the statement below, allegedly
 
made by Savarkar in Nagpur on 15th August 1943 “I have no quarrel with
 
Mr. Jinnah's two-nation theory. We, Hindus, are a nation by ourselves and
 
it is a historical fact that Hindus and Muslims are two nations.''
 
However, Savarkar had himself refuted this statement, published in
 
a few newspapers, was a distortion of his views. In the interview with
 
Savarkar published in the daily Kaal dated 19th August 1943, Savarkar
 
had clarified that either deliberately or due to lack of space, the distorted
 
and misleading idea that Savarkar supported the Two Nation Theory had
 
been published. Basically, Muslims all over the world have always
 
considered themselves as a religious state under the rule of the Khalifa
 
and it is in this sense that the Muslims consider themselves a separate
 
nation. But in reality, from the point of view of political democracy, Hindus
 
have always been the nation as they have lived here since time
 
immemorial, while Muslims have always been an aggressive minority. The
 
threat of Partition was created due to this approach of the Muslims and
 
Savarkar ordered the party workers of the Hindu Maha Sabha to actively
 
oppose Partition. The Two nation theory was originally propounded by Sir
 
Sayyad Ahmed in the 19th Century, it was then propogated by the poet
 
Iqbal and finally this demand was supported by the Muslim League under
 
the leadership of Jinnah. Savarkar was not related to it in any way. This is
 
clear from the speeches he made from time to time. It is important to once
 
again stress the fact that Savarkar himself had immediately clarified that
 
the quoted statement was a distortion of his views.
 
Allegation no. 4 – Swatantryaveer Savarkar was a collaborator
 
in the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi.
 
Savarkar had been honourably acquitted of the charge of
 
assassinating Gandhi. Nathuram Godse was an erstwhile follower of
 
Savarkar but there was not the slightest evidence presented in court to
 
prove that Savarkar was involved in the conspiracy to assassinate
 
Gandhi. Despite this, Mr. Takle has concluded from the Kapoor
 
Commission Report that Savarkar was the mastermind behind the
 
conspiracy; this statement is utterly false.
 
The Kapoor Commission deliberately referes to Godse and the
 
other accused as Savarkarwadi – Savarkar’s followers – at numerous
 
points in their report. Godse and others were followers of Hindu Maha
 
Sabha and Savarkar was in contact with them in his capacity as President.
 
For about two years before Gandhi’s assassination, he had resigned from
 
his post as President and thus had had no contact with Godse thereafter.
 
(....)
 
It is out of hatred that the accused in the case were repeatedly
 
referred to as Savarkar’s followers. Kapoor’s hatred of Maharashtra
 
becomes evident through the fact that in the findings of his report para
 
26.112, he has compared Godse to the lightning moves of the Maratha
 
army. It is not becoming for a retired Justice of the Supreme Court to make
 
such irresponsible statements.
 
Further, Kapoor Commission in Chapter 25 has made statements to
 
the effect that the evidence available to Nagarwala pointed to a conspiracy
 
to murder and that Nagarwala should have investigated it as such. But
 
without any concrete evidence, they make the irresponsible statement ‘All
 
these facts taken together were destructive of any theory other than the
 
conspiracy to murder by Savarkar and his group.’ However there is no
 
such reference in the findings of Chapter 25. Nor in the final findings of
 
the report. This false and entirely unsupported statement cannot be
 
considered as a finding of the Commission.
 
Even further, Mr. Takle has added another extreme falsehood to his
 
article by stating that two witnesses, Savarkar’s secretary Gajanan Damle
 
and his bodyguard Appa Kasar had testified that they were aware of
 
Savarkar’s complicity in the Gandhi assassination. These two had not
 
been called as witnesses during the actual trial of the case. Their names
 
do not even appear on the list of the 101 witnesses examined by the
 
Kapoor Commission.
 
Allegation no. 5 – Savarkar was opposed to the tricolour
 
National Flag.
 
Reality – Though it is a fact that Savarkar was strongly opposed to
 
adoption of Congress flag, the tricolour sporting the charkha as a National
 
Flag, he was in support of the Indian tricolour adorned with the Ashoka
 
Chakra. In fact he himself hoited National Tricolor flag on his house on
 
15th August 1947.
 
It should also be noted that the first Indian National flag unfurled by
 
Madam Cama at the Stuttgart International Conference was designed by
 
him and was a tricolor flag.
 
– Ranjit Savarkar, Chairman, Swatantryaveer Savarkar Rashtriya Smarak, Dadar, Mumbai 
Click here to buy CD/DVD
"Hum Hi Hamare Wali Hai
listen to this song Online(gaana.com)
Link for iTune
Donations Read
News ↓
स्वा. सावरकरांच्या मार्सेलिस उडीच्या स्मरणार्थ सावरकर स्मारकात रक्तदान व आरोग्य शिबीर
मंजिरी मराठे लिखित सावकरांवरील पुस्तकाचे भाजपाध्यक्ष अमित शहा यांच्याकडून प्रकाशन
स्वातंत्र्यवीर सावरकर राष्ट्रीय स्मारकात स्वातंत्र्यवीरांना अमित शहा यांचे अभिवादन
स्वातंत्र्यवीर सावरकर राष्ट्रीय स्मारकात स्वातंत्र्यवीरांना अमित शहा यांचे अभिवादन
बाबाराव सावरकर यांची जयंती साजरी
*अंदमान सहल -नोव्हेंबर २०१७*
रोखमुक्त व्यवहारांची आधुनिक खेडी ही काळाची गरज
स्वा. सावरकर राष्ट्रीय स्मारकाची शिवराज्याभिषेक सोहळ्यानिमित्त मानवंदना
सावरकर स्मारकाच्या पुढाकाराने धसईतील स्वयंचलित बँकेचे अण्णा हजारेंकडून उद्घाटन स्वातंत्र्यवीर सावरकरांचा त्याग विसरता कामा नये ः अण्णा हजारे
स्वातंत्र्यवीर सावरकर राष्ट्रीय स्मारकाची ग्रंथसंपदा राष्ट्रभक्तीच्या प्रचारार्थ खास 50 टक्के सवलतीत
स्वातंत्र्यवीर सावरकरांचे देशाच्या सुरक्षेचे विचार हेच राष्ट्रीय सुरक्षेसाठी आवश्यक ः तरुण विजय
स्वातंत्र्यवीर सावरकर राष्ट्रीय स्मारकाची शौर्य व विज्ञान पुरस्काराची दैदिप्यमान परंपरा
स्वातंत्र्यवीर सावरकर राष्ट्रीय स्मारकाला अव्वल सुरक्षा यंत्रणेबद्दल विशेष पुरस्कार
आत्मविश्वास देखील स्व-संरक्षणाचे प्रभावी माध्यम - पो.नि.गुलाब पाटील
रणजित सावरकर यांच्या पुढाकाराने धसई गाव ठरले देशातील पहिले कॅशलेस गाव
Rebuttal of Defamatory Article on Savarkar
स्वातंत्र्यवीर सावरकरांच्या ववरुद्ध खोट्या आरोपांना चोख उत्तर
Videos